Other editions - View all
action ad valorem affirmed agent alleged amount aniline dyes answer appeal appellee application assignment attorney bankruptcy bill bonds cause cent centum ad valorem certificate charge Circuit Court claim Cleaveland complainants contract Cook County corporation creditors Cummings & Woodruff debt declared decree defendant in error delivered the opinion dollars duty entitled entry equity evidence execution fact favor filed firm fraud fraudulent garnishees grant held Hoffheimer interest issued judgment jury JUSTICE letters patent lien Lisso ment Missouri mortgage November November 11 November 25 paid parties patent payment Peabody person petition plaintiff in error possession premises purchase question railroad company Railway real estate received record recover Revised Statutes Robertson Scheen Stat Statement statute of limitations Strauss & Levy suit Supreme Court taxes Territory Texas thereof tion trial trust deed United Vane verdict void Williams Company writ of error
Page 638 - State in which a decision in the suit could be had, where is drawn in question the validity of a treaty or statute of, or an authority exercised under, the United States, and the decision is against their validity; or where is drawn in question the validity of a statute of, or an authority exercised under, any State, on the ground of their being repugnant to the Constitution, treaties or laws of the United States...
Page 733 - Liberty itself will find in such a government, with powers properly distributed and adjusted, its surest guardian. It is, indeed, little else than a name, where the government is too feeble to withstand the enterprises of faction, to confine each member of the society within the limits prescribed by the laws, and to maintain all in the secure and tranquil enjoyment of the rights of person and property.
Page 291 - Such as shall be conveyed to it in satisfaction of debts previously contracted in the course of its dealings.
Page 694 - Whenever a patent, on application, is refused, either by the commissioner of patents, or by the supreme court of the District of Columbia upon appeal from the commissioner, the applicant may have remedy by bill In equity, and the court having cognizance thereof, on notice to adverse parties and other due proceedings had, may adjudge that such applicant Is entitled, according to law, to receive a patent for his invention, as specified in his claim, or for any part thereof, as the facts in the case...
Page 143 - That suits, actions, and proceedings against any association under this Title may be had in any circuit, district, or territorial court of the United States held within the district in which such association may be established, or in any State, county, or municipal court in the county or city in which said association is located having jurisdiction in similar cases.
Page 579 - And when in any suit mentioned in this section there shall be a controversy which is wholly between citizens of different states, and which can be fully determined as between them, then either one or more of the defendants actually interested in such controversy may remove said suit into the circuit court of the United States for the proper district.
Page 258 - ... material, quality, texture, or the use to which it may be applied, to any enumerated article chargeable with duty, the same rate of duty which is levied and charged on the enumerated article which it most resembles in any of the particulars before mentioned; and if any non-enumerated article equally resembles two or more enumerated articles, on which different rates of duty are chargeable, there shall be levied, collected, and paid, on such non-enumerated article, the same rate of duty as is...
Page 415 - Secondly, it may be apparent from the intrinsic nature and subject of the bargain itself; such as no man in his senses, and not under delusion, would make on the one hand, and as no honest and fair man would accept on the other; which are inequitable and unconscientious bargains, and of such even the Common Law has taken notice.
Page 440 - no suit, either at law or in equity, shall be maintainable in any court between an assignee in bankruptcy and a person claiming an adverse interest, touching any property or rights of property transferable to or vested in *such assignee, unless brought within two years from the time when the cause of action accrued for or against such assignee.