Expert Witnessing: Explaining and Understanding Science
CRC Press, Dec 29, 1998 - Law - 256 pages
Communication problems between science and the courts are widely deplored and sometimes exploited by a variety of groups. The U.S. Supreme Court has twice tightened the law of evidence to control the flow of information, but amazingly little has been written to analyze the nature of the problem and reduce the barriers. Expert Witnesses: Explaining and Understanding Science results from the first-hand experience of the contributors-who include scientists, expert witnesses, litigators, and a judge-that the cultural and interdisciplinary communications barriers between science and the law can be greatly reduced to everybody's advantage if the parties understand and respect each other's needs and positions.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Science Medicine and the U S Common Law Courts
Are Jurors Sinart Enough to Understand Scientific Evidence?
The Fundamental Differences Between Science and Law
Tensions Between Science
Expert Testimony Involving Chemists and Chemistry
The Role of Experts in German Environmental Law
Distinguishing Good Science Bad Science and Junk Science
The Five Dimensions of Scientific Testimony
Other editions - View all
acceptance addition American analysis apply areas assessment associated attorney authority become believe cancer causation cause chemical civil claims clinical communication complex concentration concerning conductivity consider contaminant court courtroom Daubert decision depends determine develop diagnosis disease effects environmental epidemiologic error established evaluate examination example expert witnesses explained exposure fact factors Federal field gasoline groundwater half-life identify important increase individual interpretation involving issues judge jurors jury knowledge lead litigation means medicine methods nature observed opinion particular parties patient peer physicians plaintiff practice presented principle probability problems procedures professional published question reasoning release relevant reliability reported requires result risk role rule scientific evidence scientists soil specific standard studies technical testimony theory tort toxic treatment trial understand University