1. The only causes for total divorce in Georgia are those recognised by the common law, to wit, pre-contract, consanguinity, affinity and corporeal infirmity. Head vs. Head
2. And the only causes recognised in Georgia, for a partial divorce, are those of the common law, to wit, adultery and cruel treatment.
DORMANT JUDGMENTS AND EXECUTIONS.
1. Under the Acts of 1822 and 1823, to prevent the fraudu- lent enforcement of dormant judgments and executions, a return must be made by the proper officer on such execution every seven years, or it will be presumed to have been satisfied and fraudulently kept open. Booth vs. Williams
1. When a court of chancery will appoint a guardian ad litem to an infant plaintiff. See title " Guardian ad litem." Leonard vs. Scarborough and wife and others
2. A party having elected to proceed at law, equity will not interpose until he has pushed his remedy to every available extent: neither will a court of chancery antic- ipate, that the legal redress may not prove effectual. McGough & Crews vs. The Insurance Bank and Mc- Dougald
3. The garnishment acts of this State, may not, either in express terms or by fair implication, have ousted chan- cery of its previous jurisdiction over the same subject matter; still if a bill were filed, it would be demurrable upon the ground that there was an ample remedy at law, unless there was something peculiar in the circum- stances of the case. Ib.
4. A charge in a creditor's bill, that he fears, that his debtor
if he gets possession of funds, which he is proceeding to collect under execution, will apply them to the payment of other liens having no priority over his own, will not justify the interposition of a court of chancery. He must state the ground of his fears, or allege some issuable fact, such as a fraudulent combination between his debtor and other creditors, to entitle him to relief. Ib.
5. In this State, a verdict for the defendant in an equity cause on the first trial thereof, does not operate as a dissolution of the injunction granted therein, as a matter of course, when an appeal is entered from such verdict in accordance with the provisions of the Act of 1843. Neisler and others vs. Smith
6. A court of equity will not grant relief against a judg- ment at law, on the ground of its being unconscientious, unless the defendant in the judgment was entirely ig norant of his defence pending the suit, or unless with- out any default or neglect on his part, he was prevented by fraud, or accident, or the act of the opposite party, from availing himself of his defence, or by some unavoid- able necessity. Stroup vs. Sullivan and Black -
7. In cases of fraud (with the exception of fraud in obtain- ing a will,) courts of equity and courts of law have concurrent jurisdiction, and the court which first ac- quires jurisdiction is entitled to retain it. Slade and others vs. Lowe's admr. and others
8. Where a bill was filed by judgment creditors to set aside a conveyance as fraudulent, it was held, a court of equity had jurisdiction, notwithstanding the creditors might have sued the donee as executor de son tort, after the death of the donor. Ib.
9. To a bill for relief and injunction against plaintiffs in execution, issuing upon a common law judgment, their attorneys, against whom no fraud is charged nor relief sought, ought not to be made parties. Kenan & Rock- well vs. Miller
10. If a complainant in equity has been before a competent tribunal at law which has given judgment against him, that judgment, unless reversed, is conclusive upon him in the other forum, even as to matters of defence which he might have presented, but neglected to introduce at the proper time; and that too, notwithstanding the de- cision disallowing his plea was erroneous.
11. Multifariousness defined. See title "Multifariousness.” Butler and others vs. Durham
12. Where there is a special prayer and a general prayer, the complainant under the general prayer may have such other relief only, as is consistent with the case made in the bill and with the special prayer. Ib.
13. Equity has jurisdiction to direct the cancellation of deeds and other instruments, which are functus officio by payment or other cause, but will exercise it only in its sound discretion, in cases where the defence at law is not adequate, by reason of loss of testimony, lapse of time, or something peculiar to the case. 1b.
14. A court of equity will retain a bill, at the instance of the vendee of lands, to rescind the contract, notwithstand- ing he had not been evicted from the possession of the premises, nor had abandoned the possession thereof, nor had offered to do so. Coffee and others vs. Newsom, Executor
1. When a court of equity will retain a bill to rescind a contract at the instance of the vendee of lands without his eviction first from the premises. See title “Fraud." Coffee and others vs. Newsom, Executor
1. The declaration and other original papers of file in the clerk's office, may be used in evidence in the same court to which they belong. Peck vs. Land
2. When party not bound by his acknowledgment or ad- mission. See title "Admissions." Solomon vs. Solomon, Ex. &c.
3. The Act of 1802, prohibiting the Judges of the Su- perior Courts from withholding any grant, deed or other document from the jury, unless barred by the act of limitations, does not repeal the law of evidence as to the execution of such papers, nor prevent the judges from pronouncing upon their legal character. The only effect which it has is to prevent them from withholding from the jury, papers whose legal character is admitted or ad- judged by the court, and are legally proven. Hester, Executor vs. Young
4. A testamentary paper cannot be read to the jury in any case affecting the title to personalty in a court of com- mon law, until it has passed to probate before the Ordi- nary. Hester, Executor vs. Young
5. The news-paper itself is the best evidence of any arti- cle, which has been published in its columns. Bond vs. The Central Bank
6. In an action of trover by an executor or administrator, who declares on his own constructive possession, and al- leges the conversion after the death of the testator or in- testate, it is necessary for him to introduce in evidence his letters testamentary or of administration, on the trial, as a part of his title to enable him to recover. Robinson vs. Mc Donald
7. What shall be sufficient evidence of conversion, in the absence of proof of demand and refusal, to render the defendant in trover liable. See title "Trover." Ib.
8. The plaintiff is not required to produce evidence to ex- plain any alteration in the instrument sued on, where it is declared upon, as altered, unless the same is denied by the defendant on oath, in his answer. Tedlie vs. Dill
9. When the question is, whether a homicide is felonious
or justifiable, the opinion of a witness, as to the intention of the deceased in approaching the prisoner, is not evi- dence: Aliter as to any information which the witness may have communicated, whether true or false. Hudg ins vs. The State
10. Parol evidence admissible to show whether Justices of the Iuferior Court, signing a note with the addition of the initials J. I. C. to their names, made the contract upon which the note was given in their individual or offi- cial character as agents of the public. Ghent and others vs. Adams
11. The admissions of one member of a firm, who is not a party to the suit, when the court is satisfied that the part- nership has been established, may be given in evidence to charge the other members, but not otherwise. Mc- Cutchin vs. Bankston
12. Trusts in personal property may be created and proven, by parol declarations. Kirkpatrick, guardian vs. David-
13. The record is the only legal evidence of the discharge of bail upon the surrender of his principal during the session of the court. Griffin vs. Moore
14. Parol evidence is inadmissible to prove the cause of taking a recognisance. The offence must be specified in the recognisance itself. Nicholson vs. The State
15. The court will not permit evidence aliunde the record certified to this court, to be received for the purpose of showing an appeal bond was given, and who the secu- rity was, but if the record is not complete, the party sug- gesting a diminution thereof, has his remedy under the XVIIIth rule of this court. Coffee and others vs. Newsom, Executor
1. If an execution is paid by the justice of the peace, or
« PreviousContinue » |