12 c CALIFORNIA DECISIONS TWENTY-FIFTH YEAR THE OFFICIAL ORGAN OF THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA RANDOLPH V. WHITING, Editor VOLUME XLIX JANUARY-JUNE, 1915 THE RECORDER PRINTING AND PUBLISHING COMPANY, 28 Montgomery St., San Francisco, Cal. CALIFORNIA DECISIONS TABLE OF CASES In cases indicated with a * rehearings have been granted. (See table, page viii.) 57 American Nat'l Bank of S. F.. . Sac. No. 2137 543 American Surety Co. of N. Y. et al. v. City Street Improvement Co. et al.. .S. F. No. 6496 67 Anderson etc. et al. v. Los Angeles Transfer Co.L. A. No. 3459 591 Application of Richardson. . Crim. No. 1910 593 Arnold v. Krigbaum et al., .S. F. No. 6921 Arnold v. Loomis et al.... S. F. No. 5876 612 'Barber Asphalt Paving Company v. Jurgens..S. F. No. 6460 740 *Barlow v. Frink.. .L. A. No. 3445 411 Baur et al. v. Davis et al.... Sac. No. 2160 457 Bell v. Krauss et al... .L. A. No. 3826 231 Bidwell v. Los Angeles and San Diego Beach Railway Co. .L. A. No. 3430 525 Black et al. v. Hunter et al. .L. A. No. 3457 417 Bond v. United Railroads of San Francisco...S. F. No. 6325 164 Bond v. United Railroads of San Francisco.. S. F. No. 7224 396 Booth v. Mott et al.. S. F. No. 7356 447 Borges v. Dunham. S. F. No. 7132 12 Briles V. Paulson. Sac. No. 2181 694 Briles et al. v. Paulson. Sac. No. 212984 Brown v. Brown.. Sac. No. 2121 537 Brown v. Brown. Sac. No. 2122 542 Bryan v. Superior Court of California.. S. F. No. 7210 507 Byington et al. v. Sacramento Valley West Side Canal Co. et al.. Sac. No. 2119 633 California-Calaveras Mining Co. v. Walls et al. . Sac. No. 2115 749 Camozzi v. Colusa Sandstone Co.. S. F. No. 6504 69 Cardoza v. Pillsbury et al. S. F. No. 7262 33 Careaga v. Becker et al., .S. F. No. 6106 142 Carty v. Blauth. Sac. No. 2138 478 Cates et al. v. McNeil et al. .L. A. No. 3451 463 Cecil et al. v. Gray et al.. Sac. No. 2162 642 Champagne v. Hamburger & Sons.. .L. A. No. 3455 449 Chrissinger v. Southern Pacific Co. et al. Sac. No. 2171 397 City of Hanford v. Hanford Gas & Power Co... Sac. No. 2118 501 City of Los Angeles et al. v. Dehy.. .L. A. No. 3795 126 City of Los Angeles etc, v. Krutz, Jr., etc, et al.L. A. No. 3492 781 Coffey v. City of Berkeley.. S. F. No. 6533 730 Cook v. Los Angeles Railway Corporation. .L. A. No. 3431 27 Corey v. Struve et al.. S. F. No. 6391 681 *Coulter Dry Goods Co. v. Wentworth et al. .L. A. No. 3783 564 Cripe v. Cripe.. .L. A. No. 3471 608 Crouch v. Miller & Co.. .L. A. No. 3423 193 Dam v. Superior Court of Alameda County...S. F. NO. 7126 103 De Freitas et al. v. The Town of Suisun.. . Sac. No. 2156 737 De Watson v. San Pedro, Los Angeles and Salt Lake Railroad.... .L. A. No. 3300 323 1On hearing after judgment in District Court of Appeal, Third District (19 Cal. App. Dec. 243). Dibble v. Reliance Life Insurance Co. of Pitts- S. F. No. 6449 685 Duckworth v. Watsonville Water and Light Dunne Investment Company v. Empire State .S. F. No. 6466 877 Earhart et al. v. Churchill Co... Ehrhart et al. v. Mahony et al., Emerson v. Kennedy Mining & Milling Co. et al. Sac. No. 2117 473 Empire Investment Co. v. Mort et al. .... Sac. Nos. 2175-2176 485 Escondido Mutual Water Co. v. City of Es- .S. F. No. 7068 Estate of Reynolds et al. L. A. No. 3675 383 Estate of Rossi etc.. .S. F. No. 6982 60 Estate of Scott. .L. A. No. 4125 592 Estate of Servas. .S. F. No. 6911 115 Estate of Silva. .S. F. No. 6772 40 Estate of Tooley. . Sac. No. 2280 857 Estate of Tooley. .. Sac. No. 2280 676 Ex parte McDonough Crim. No. 1918 711 Ex parte McDonough. .. Crim. No. 1918 717 F. A. Hihn Company V. City of Santa Cruz .S. F. No. 6385 859 Fairburn v. American River Elec. Co. Sac. No. 2132 627 Fearon v. Fodera et al. .S. F. No. 6798 214 Fearon V. Fodera et al. .S. F. No. 6798 403 Flint v. San Pedro, L. A. & Salt Lake R, R. Co.L. A. No. 3298 324 Ford v. Weed Lumber Co.. ..S. F. No. 6215 45 Franscioni v. Soledad Land and Water Co.....S. F. No. 6538 704 Fresno Canal and Irrigation Co. V. Perrin et al. .S. F. No. 6473 845 Fritz v. Mills et al. .S. F. No. 6332 878 Ghriest etc. v. Railroad Commission of Cali- fornia L. A. No. 3713 581 Glougie v. Superior Court. .S. F. No. 7358 448 Godfrey v. Wisner. Sac. No. 2169 444 Goldberg, Bowen & Co. v. Dimick et al. S. F. No. 6381 91 Goldman v. Palmtag.. .S. F. No. 6408 67 Goodwin v. Whittier Coburn Co.... .L. A. No. 3480 769 Great Western Power Co. v. Pillsbury et al.... Sac. No. 2237 667 -On hearing after judgment in District Court of Appeal, First District (17 Cal. App. Dec. 729). *Griffin et al. v. S. P., L. A. & S. L. R. R. Co. et al.L. A. No. 3641 223 .L. A. No. 3456 392 . Sac. No. 2190 645 L. A. No. 3325 571 Happy Valley Land & Water Co. v. Nelson et al. . Sac. No. 2167 460 .L. A. No. 3360 530 .L. A. No. 3476 607 S. F. No. 7084 211 Hubbard et al v. Brinker et al. In re Guardianship of Ambrose.. In re Guardianship of Michels. Knobloch v. Associated Oil Co... Kunz v. California Trona Co. et al. Kunz v. California Trona Co, et al. Lincoln County Bank v. Fetterman. Lukrawka et al. v. Spring Valley Water Co..S. F. No. 6297 177 Marshall & Stearns Co. v. Deneen Bldg Co. S. F. No. 6269 104 S. F. No. 6122 142 .S. F. No. 6757 190 McLaughlin et al. v. United Railroads of S. F.S. F. No. 6195 303 Metropolis Trust & Savings Bank v. Monnier. .S. F. No. 6132 377 Miller et al. v. Pac. Elec. Ry. Co... .L, A. No. 3437 .S. F. No. 6061 251 . Sac. No. 2259 367 S. F. No. 7446 892 Sac. No. 2052 472 .L. A. No. 3389 490 Neal Publishing Co. v. Rolph. Jr. Nichols et al. v. McCullom et al. (v) 29 |
