The Pacific Reporter, Volume 27West Publishing Company, 1892 - Law reports, digests, etc "Comprising all the decisions of the Supreme Courts of California, Kansas, Oregon, Washington, Colorado, Montana, Arizona, Nevada, Idaho, Wyoming, Utah, New Mexico, Oklahoma, District Courts of Appeal and Appellate Department of the Superior Court of California and Criminal Court of Appeals of Oklahoma." (varies) |
From inside the book
Results 6-10 of 75
Page 70
... reason of such applica- tion , nor by reason of the subsequent ap proval and certificate of purchase issued to her . Buchanan v . Nagle , ( Cal . ) 26 Pac . Rep . 512. The court , therefore , properly decided against her claim , and ...
... reason of such applica- tion , nor by reason of the subsequent ap proval and certificate of purchase issued to her . Buchanan v . Nagle , ( Cal . ) 26 Pac . Rep . 512. The court , therefore , properly decided against her claim , and ...
Page 91
... reason of the defective and unsafe condition of said bridge , and . by reason of the failure of the defendant to keep a proper watch and oversight , and to ascertain and report the condition thereof to the officers in charge of said ...
... reason of the defective and unsafe condition of said bridge , and . by reason of the failure of the defendant to keep a proper watch and oversight , and to ascertain and report the condition thereof to the officers in charge of said ...
Page 112
... reasons ; but , if the ruling of the justice was right , we could not reverse the same , even if we should think that he gave a wrong reason therefor . As to dismissing actions for want of jurisdiction and tax- ing all the costs to the ...
... reasons ; but , if the ruling of the justice was right , we could not reverse the same , even if we should think that he gave a wrong reason therefor . As to dismissing actions for want of jurisdiction and tax- ing all the costs to the ...
Page 118
... reason that the stat- ute there commented on required that the act to be done should be done " at least one day before the day of the trial , " and not at least one day before the trial . One | clear day , besides the fractions of the ...
... reason that the stat- ute there commented on required that the act to be done should be done " at least one day before the day of the trial , " and not at least one day before the trial . One | clear day , besides the fractions of the ...
Page 120
... reason for this , as shown by the evidence , is that the plaintiff had entered into a combination with other manufacturers of wire , under heavy pen- alties , not to sell wire for rates less than those mentioned in the foregoing ...
... reason for this , as shown by the evidence , is that the plaintiff had entered into a combination with other manufacturers of wire , under heavy pen- alties , not to sell wire for rates less than those mentioned in the foregoing ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
affidavit affirmed alleged amended amount answer Appeal from superior appellant appellee application assignment attorney authority bill cause of action Cheyenne county Civil Code claim Code Civil Proc Colo commenced complaint concur contract conveyance conveyed corporation counsel Court of California court of equity creditors damages debt decree deed defendant's demurrer denied district court ditch entitled evidence executed fact fendant filed findings fraud garnishee grant ground held interest issue judge judgment jurisdiction jury justice land lien Lovejoy McHatton ment mortgage motion notice owner paid parties payment person petition plain plaintiff in error pleadings possession premises proceedings purchase purpose question quitclaim deed reason record refused respondent rule statute statute of limitations sufficient superior court Supreme Court testimony therein thereof tiff tion tract trial court trust verdict writ
Popular passages
Page 308 - ... a question of fact for the jury, and not of law for the court.
Page 350 - The granting of a new trial places the parties in the same position as if no trial had been had. All the testimony must be produced anew, and the former verdict cannot be used or referred to, either in evidence or in argument, or be pleaded in bar of any conviction which might have been had under the indictment.
Page 73 - Every mortgage or conveyance intended to operate as a mortgage of goods and chattels which shall hereafter be made which shall not be accompanied by an immediate delivery and followed by an actual and continued change of possession...
Page 401 - No action for the recovery of real property, or for the recovery of the possession thereof, shall be maintained, unless it appear that the plaintiff, his ancestor, predecessor, or grantor, was seized or possessed of the premises in question within twenty years before the commencement of such action.
Page 231 - The legislature shall direct by law in what manner and in what courts suits may be brought against the State.
Page 86 - A valuable consideration, in the sense of the law, may consist either in some right, interest, profit, or benefit accruing to the one party, or some forbearance, detriment, loss or responsibility given, suffered, or undertaken by the other.
Page 44 - ... jointly and severally liable to the corporation, and to the creditors thereof, in the event of its dissolution, to the full amount of the capital stock so divided...
Page 31 - Procedure; and if such allegation be controverted, the party pleading must establish, on the trial, the facts showing that the cause of action is so barred.
Page 56 - Claims against a trustee by virtue of a contract or by operation of law; 5.
Page 403 - In an action to recover real property, or the possession thereof, the person who establishes a legal title to the premises is presumed to have been possessed thereof, within the time required by law ; and the occupation of the premises, by another person, is deemed to have been under and in subordination to the legal title, unless the premises have been held and possessed adversely to the legal title, for twenty years before the commencement of the action.