| Law reports, digests, etc - 1919 - 1016 pages
...railroad or system of transportation by the Director General of Railroads which action, suit or proceeding but for Federal control might have been brought against...Director General of Railroads, and not otherwise." The General Order further provided: "The pleadings in all actions at law, suits in equity, or proceedings... | |
| Missouri. Courts of Appeals - Law reports, digests, etc - 1921 - 820 pages
...control might have been brought against the carrier" shall be brought against the Director General and not otherwise; "provided however that this order...the recovery of fines, penalties and forfeitures." On this last clause the defendant claims exemption from double damages. The act of congress of March... | |
| New York (N.Y.). Board of Standards and Appeals - Building laws - 1919 - 1056 pages
...or system of transportation by the Director-General of Railroads, which action, suit or proceeding but for Federal control might have been brought against the carrier company, shall be brought against the DirectorGeneral of Railroads, and not otherwise; provided, However, that this order shall not apply... | |
| Law reports, digests, etc - 1919 - 1056 pages
...which action, suit or proceeding, but for federal control, might have been brought against the earrie:- company, shall be brought against William G. McAdoo,...Director General of Railroads, and not otherwise." The order further provides that in all actions of the same character already pending against the carrier... | |
| Law reports, digests, etc - 1921 - 1058 pages
...or system of transportation by the Director General of Railroads, which action, suit, or proceeding but for federal control might have been brought against the carrier company, shall bo brought against William G. McAdoo, Director General of Railroads, and not otherwise : Provided,... | |
| Law reports, digests, etc - 1921 - 1098 pages
...growing out of the possession, use, control, or operation of any railroad by the Director General, which but for federal control might have been brought against the carrier company, should be brought against him, the Director General, and not otherwise. Finally this action was brought... | |
| |