...would it be seriously contended that the civil government under which he lived could not interfere to prevent a sacrifice? Or if a wife religiously believed...government to prevent her carrying her belief into practice 't So here, as a law of the organization of society under the exclusive dominion of the United States,...

...while they cannot interfere with mere religious beliefs and opinions, they may with practices. * * * So here, as a law of the organization of society under the exclusive dominion of the United States, it is provided that plural marriages shall not be allowed (pp. 165, 166). Therefore, in order to sustain...

...worship, would it be seriously contended that thecivil government under which he lived could not interfere to prevent a sacrifice? Or if a wife religiously believed...under the exclusive dominion of the United States, it is provided that plural marriages shall not be allowed. Can a man excuse his practices to the contrary...

...would it be seriously contended that the civil government under which he lived could not interfere to prevent a sacrifice? Or, if a wife religiously...under the exclusive dominion of the United States, it is provided that plural marriages shall not be allowed. Can a man excuse his practices to the contrary...

...would it be seriously contended that the civil government under which he lived could not interfere to prevent a sacrifice? Or if a wife religiously believed it was her duty to burn herself upon the funeral pyre of her dead husband, would it be beyond the power of the civil government to prevent her from...

...would it be seriously contended that the civil government under which he lived could not interfere to prevent a sacrifice? Or if a wife religiously believed...to prevent her carrying her belief Into practice? ±e very least, it la within Congressional power to explore the practicality Mans to prevent such happenings...

...would it be seriously contended that the civil government under which he lived could not Interfere to prevent a sacrifice? Or if a wife religiously believed...to prevent her carrying her belief into practice? At the very least, It is within Congressional power to explore the practicality of means to prevent...

...would it be seriously contended that the civil government under which he lived could not interfere to prevent a sacrifice? Or if a wife religiously believed...to prevent her carrying her belief into practice? At the very least, it is within Congressional power to explore the practicality of swans to prevent...

...would it be seriously contended that the civil government under which he lived could not interfere to prevent a sacrifice! Or if a wife religiously believed...power of the civil government to prevent her carrying '"'•<' belief Into practlcet At the very least, it is within Congressional power to explore the practicality...

...would it be seriously contended that the civil government under which he lived could not interfere to prevent a sacrifice? Or if a wife religiously believed it was her duty to burn herself upon the funeral [pyre] of her husband, would it be beyond the power of the civil government to prevent her carrying...