...interference of others, unless by clear and unquestionable authority of law. As well said by Judge Cooley : " The right to one's person may be said to be a right of complete immunity; to be let alone." (Cooley, Torts. 29.) For instance, not only wearing apparel, but a watch or a jewel, worn on the person,...

...interference by others, unless by clear and unquestionable authority of law. As well said by Judge Cooley, "the right to one's person may be said to be a right of complete immunity; to be let alone." Cooley Torts, 29. "The inviolability of the person is as much invaded by a compulsory stripping as...

...private^ property. ' ' 3 Black. Comm. p. *119. Judge Cooley in his Elements of Torts (page 9), said: "The right to one's person may be said to be a right to complete immunity; to be let alone. An attempt to commit a battery usually involves an insult, a...

...of the inviolability of the person, denned by Judge Cooley in his work on Torts, 2d ed. p. 29, as: "Personal Immunity. The right to one's person may...be a right of complete immunity: to be let alone;" and that a person is entitled to relief at law or in equity for an invasion of the same, is generally...

...originally published in 1879. In discoursing on "The Right of Privacy," Judge Cooley asserted that "The right to one's person may be said to be a right to complete immuntiy: to be let alone." 3 Then, in 1890, Samuel D. Warren and Louis D. Brandeis published...

...originally published in 1 879. In discoursing on "The Right of Privacy," Judge Cooley asserted that "The right to one's person may be said to be a right to complete immuntiy: to be let alone." ' Then, in 1890, Samuel D. Warren and Louis D. Brandéis published...

...originally published in 1879. In discoursing on "The Right of Privacy," Judge Cooley asserted that "The right to one's person may be said to be a right to complete immuntiy: to be let alone." 8 Then, in 1890, Samuel D. Warren and Louis D. Brandeis published...

...interference of others, unless by clear and unquestionable authority of law. As well said by Judge Cooley, "the right to one's person may be said to be a right of complete immunity: to be let alone." 12 Similarly, in Meyer v. Nebraska. 262 US 390, 392 (1923), it was stated: [W]e should not overlook...

...interference of others, unless by clear and unquestionable authority of law. As well said by Judge Cooley, "the right to one's person may be said to be a right of complete immunity: to be let alone." 12 Similarly, in Meyer v. Nebraska. 262 US 390, 392 (1923), it was stated: [W]e should not overlook...

...all restraint or interference of others, unless by clear and unquestionable authority of law. . . . "The right to one's person may be said to be a right...of complete immunity: to be let alone." . . . The inviolability of the person is as much invaded by a compulsory stripping and exposure as by a blow....