...contract, expressed or implied, with the Government of the United States, or tor damages, liquidated or unliquidated, in cases not sounding in tort, in...equity, or admiralty if the United States were suable : Provided, however, That nothing in this section shall be construed War claims, as giving to either...

...contract, express or implied, with the government of the United Status, or for damages, liquidated or unliquidated, in cases not sounding in tort, in...the party would be entitled to redress against the ("ni ted States either in a court of law, equity, or admiralty, it the United States were suable."...

...contract, expressed or implied, with the Government of the United Slates, or for damages, liquidated or unliquidated, in cases not sounding in tort, in...either in a court of law, equity, or admiralty, if the Umted States were suable, except claims growing out of the late civil war, and commonly known as war...

...the plaintiff may proceed with the case SPEAKERS OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES. claims the partv would be entitled to redress against the United States either in a court of law, equity, or admiralty The following is a complete list of the Speakers of the House of Representatives from the organization...

...contract expressed or implied with the government of the United States, or for damages, liquidated or unliquidated, in cases not sounding in tort, in respect of which claims the plaintiff would be entitled to redress against the United States in a court of law, equity or admiralty,...

...of the United States, or for damages, liquidated or unliquidated, in cases not sounding in tort, iu respect of which claims the party would be entitled...equity, or admiralty if the United States were suable: 1'rotided, hoieerrr. That nothing in this section shall be construed as giving to either of the courts...

...contract, express or implied, with the government of the United States, or for damages, liquidated or unliquidated, in cases not sounding in tort, in...entitled to redress against the United States either in a Dissenting Opinion: Shims, J. court of law, equity, or admiralty if the United States were suable."...

...which, for the first time in the history of that court, authorized it to take cognizance of cases where the party would be entitled to redress against the United States, either in a conrt of law, equity, or admiralty, if the United States were sueable, then to make them sueable in...

...party would be entitled to redress against the United States either in a Dissenting Opinion: Shiras, J. court of law, equity, or admiralty if the United States were suable." This legislation perhaps originated in the regret expressed by this court in Langford's case, that...

...contract expressed or implied with the government of the United States, or for damages, liquidated or unliquidated, in cases not sounding in tort, in respect of which claims the plaintiff would be entitled to redress against the United States in a court of law, equity or admiralty,...