 | Law reports, digests, etc - 1920 - 944 pages
...of things does not happen if those who have the management, with proper care, it affords reasonable evidence in the absence of explanation by the defendants, that the accident arose from want of care. To apply that doctrine to the case in question, if you find that the falling of the fan in question... | |
 | Law reports, digests, etc - 1920 - 944 pages
...of things does not happen if those who have the management, with proper care, it affords reasonable evidence in the absence of explanation by the defendants, that the accident arose from want of care. To apply that doctrine to the case in question, if you find that the falling of the fan in question... | |
 | Insurance, Atomic hazards - 1974 - 584 pages
...Scott v London & St. Katherine Docks Co., 3 H. & C. 596, 601, 159 Eng. Rep. 665, 667 (Ex. 1865): But where the thing is shewn to be under the management...defendants, that the accident arose from want of care. 17. See eg, Mack v. Reading Co., 377 Pa. 135, 103 A. 2d 749 ( 1954). 18. The procedural effect of res... | |
 | Pennsylvania. Courts - Law reports, digests, etc - 1926 - 916 pages
...management of the defendants and the accident is such as, in the ordinary course of things, does not happen if those who have the management use proper care,...explanation by the defendants, that the accident arose from a want of care." See, also, Fisher v. Ruch, 12 Pa. Superior Ct. 240; Matthews v. Pittsburgh & Lake... | |
 | Law reports, digests, etc - 1910 - 1380 pages
...C. 596) as follows: "There must be reasonable evidence of negligence; but where the thing is shown to be under the management of the defendant or his...explanation by the defendants that the accident arose from \vant of care." Our own Supreme Court, through Mr. Justice Brown (McCray v. G., H. & SA Ry. Co., 89... | |
 | Law reports, digests, etc - 1906 - 1180 pages
...not happen, if those who have the management use the proper care, it affords reasonable evidence, iu the absence of explanation by the defendants, that the accident arose from want of care." The limitations governing the application of the rule are thus stated by Wigmore (section 2509): "(1)... | |
 | Thomas A. Street - Law - 1999 - 540 pages
...his servants, and the hou * e . accident is such as in the ordinary course of things does not happen if those who have the management use proper care,...defendants, that the accident arose from want of care." 5 2. Mullen v. St. John (1874):' The plaintiff, while properly on the sidewalk of Van Brunt street,... | |
 | Graham Stephenson - Law - 2000 - 686 pages
...of things does not happen if those who have the management use proper care, it provides reasonable evidence, in the absence of explanation by the defendants that the accident arose from want of care. Now, in this case the floor of this supermarket was under the management of the defendants and their... | |
| |
There must be reasonable evidence of negligence; but where the thing is shown to be under the management of the defendant or his servants, and the accident is such as in the ordinary course of things does not happen if those who have the management use... 
