 | Washington (State). Supreme Court - Law reports, digests, etc - 1897 - 792 pages
...negligence as to preclude his maintaining an action for the injuries thereby received was a question of fact for the jury and not of law for the court. City Railway Co. v. Lee, 50 NJ Law, 435 (14 Atl. 883), is a case where a party sat on the foot board... | |
 | Railroad law - 1897 - 854 pages
...a railroad right of way of obstructions to the sight of passing or crossing travelers is a question of fact for the jury, and not of law for the court. In the case under consideration it will be observed that the court below declared the law without qualification... | |
 | Francis Marion Burdick - Partnership - 1898 - 716 pages
...acts done by the defendant or by his authority, is, as in other cases of estoppel in pais, a question of fact for the jury, and not of law for the court. The nature and amount of evidence requisite to satisfy the jury may vary according to circumstances.... | |
 | Criminal law - 1898 - 680 pages
...the effect it might have on the mind of the person to whom it was made, but still the question was one of fact for the jury and not of law for the judge. It may be that the threat in the present case is not one necessarily of a character to excite... | |
 | Abraham Clark Freeman - Law reports, digests, etc - 1899 - 1054 pages
...of them. Whether Saalfeldt properly acted in obedience to such order or not was clearly a question of fact for the jury, and not of law for the court. It is, however, further contended that whether the risk was incident to his contract of employment... | |
 | Abraham Clark Freeman - Law reports, digests, etc - 1899 - 1064 pages
...of them. Whether Saalfeldt properly acted in obedience to such order or not was clearly a question of fact for the jury, and not of law for the court. It is, however, further contended that, whether the risk was incident to his contract of employment... | |
 | Washington (State). Supreme Court - Law reports, digests, etc - 1900 - 814 pages
...for negligence, the question of whether the evidence shows proper care on the part of the defendant is one of fact for the jury and not of law for the court, when different inferences are deducible therefrom. — Lane v. Spokane Falls & N. Ry. Co 119 10. Same... | |
 | New York (State). Courts - Law reports, digests, etc - 1900 - 874 pages
...there was no intention on his part to defraud, but that question is, as in People v. Wiman, supra, one of fact for the jury, and not of law for the court upon habeas corpus and certiorarL The district attorney claims that he can prove that not only the... | |
 | Indiana - 1901 - 1792 pages
...Shinn v. State, 68 Ind. 423. 3. Whether certain labor on Sunday Is a work of necessity, is a question of fact for the. jury, and not of law for the Court. — Edgerton v. State, 67 Ind. jSS . 4. Under the corresponding section of the Act of 1852, it was... | |
| |
... a question of fact for the jury, and not of law for the court. 
