...evidence of negligence. " But where the thing is shown to be under the management of the defendant or his servants, and the accident is such as in the ordinary...reasonable evidence, in the absence of explanation by the defendants, that the accident arose from want of (e) Carpue v. London $ Brighton $ SCR Co. (1850) 5...

...(meaning the thing which caused the injury) isshown to be under the management of the defendant or his servants, and the accident is such as in the ordinary...use proper care, it affords reasonable evidence, in the absense of explanation by the defendant, and that the accident arose from want of care." In the...

...(meaning the thing which causes the injury) is shown to be under the management of the defendant or his servants, and the accident is such as in the ordinary...defendant, that the accident arose from want of care." In the case at bar the thing which obstructed the passage in the car was evidently the personal baggage...

...which fell and injured the plaintiff) " is shown to be under the management of the defendant or his servants, and the accident is such as in the ordinary...defendant, that the accident arose from want of care." In Mqffatt v. Bateman (e), it was held that the principle of Scott v. London and St. JTat/icrine's...

...But where the thing is shown to be under the management of the de16 C. of L. — 29 fendant or his servants, and the accident is such as in the ordinary...use proper care, it affords reasonable evidence, In the absence of explanation, that the accident arose from want of care." See also Priggs v. Oliver,...

...of negligence. •Bat, «hen the thing is shown to be under "lie management of the defendant or his "servants, and the accident is such as, in the 'ordinary...use " proper care, it affords reasonable evidence, *m the absence of explanation by the de" tendant, that the accident arose from want •of care." On...

...defendant or his servants, and the accident is such as, under an ordinary course of things, does not happen if those who have the management use proper care,...reasonable evidence, in the absence of explanation by the defendants, that the accident arose from want of care. ' " The principle is of special application...

...or his servants, and the accident is such as, under an ordinary course of things, does not happen, if those who have the management use proper care, it affords reasonable evidence, in the absence of explananation by the defendant, that the accident arose from want of care." The argument...

...upon reasoning like this : Where the thing is shown to be under the management of the defendant or his servants, and the accident is such as in the ordinary...defendant, that the accident arose from want of care. For authorities as to the application of the rule, Sec. 2, Thomp. on Neg. 1227, etseq. If that rnle...

...negligence." But he continues, "where the thing is solely under the management of the defendant and his servants, and the accident is such as, in the ordinary...reasonable evidence, in the absence of explanation by the defendants, that the accident arose from want of care." Opinion in Scott T>. London etc. Dock. Co.,...